Register • FAQ • Search • Login
It is currently Fri Feb 22, 2019 8:30 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » General » General Discussion

All times are UTC - 7 hours


So what's your style?



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
 [ 3 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Ravyn
 Post subject: So what's your style?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 909
Location: San Diego, CA
I don't just mean combat vs. social (vs. skill-based; so many people forget that!), or high amounts of dice-rolling vs. low, or how long the NPC list is, or descriptive vs. sparse, or how lethal a game is, or any of the single factors that tend to come up when people are asking about stylistic matters, or even what medium you tend to run/play in--I mean all of them at once. None of these things operate in a vacuum, after all.

So how do you play? How do you run? Have you noticed differences?

I'll start: I'm social and skill use dominant. I prefer small numbers of dice rolls, but when my players are rolling, it's just as often knowledge-related skills or trying to read a social situation as anything. Lots of fluff-details, lots of careful description, lots and lots of NPCs (I've only run one game, but let's just say the NPC list is big enough that even I'm starting to need a wiki to keep track of it). Run purely online by choice, will play face to face but tend not to be as good at it (and do skill-based more when face to face, but am absolutely devastating with social characters online). Low lethality; while a lot of people are fond of the risk element in combat, I play with permanent death and am more concerned with watching my players think than watching them bleed--and besides, it's so much more fun to mess with their heads to a certain extent anyway.

Your turn!

_________________
Company President, Victorious Press
Creature artist, Ouroboros Mentality; principal, Invocation Magic; primary fluff, every project that holds still long enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
DukeOfURL
 Post subject: Re: So what's your style?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 1545
Location: Maryland, USA
With three young children who I like spending time with, I find myself pretty much relegated to play-by-post games simply because I can't commit specific blocks of time to play "live". So, my style is pretty much dictated by the realities of PbP -- a lot more dialog and character interaction, lots of skill use, more RP and puzzle-solving, and less hack-and-slash. Not that I don't like a little hack-and-slash from time to time, but it is generally more difficult to deal with when all of the players are posting out-of-order and with different frequency.

_________________
Victorious Press Chief Financial Officer
Designer on: Boundless Horizons (lead), Invocation Magic (lead)


Top
 Profile  
 
Proven Paradox
 Post subject: Re: So what's your style?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:26 pm
Posts: 59
I have two distinct styles with which I run games that are dependent on whether or not I'm playing online or in-person.

On-line, I tend to run a lot of diverse NPCs with at least some depth and history behind them. I try to make my plots intricate and interesting, but I also like to design dungeons with a lot of encounters and traps. I'll proooobably start reducing the number of encounters for future, since combat on PBP takes so long, but yeah. I try to be detailed and diverse online. Outside of dungeons, I encourage PCs to split up to get more of the world I've developed in.

When I get into real-life play, I tend to be a bit more focused on one or two NPCs, primarily because I have an inflexible voice, and don't have a lot of time to flesh out a lot of different people. I've got fewer areas really well developed and more on-the-fly, vague areas for wherever the PCs go during downtime. I tend to run more kick-in-the-door games in person as well, but that's mainly because it seems to be what the players want.


When I play, I can go just about anywhere as far as character class and race goes. I've got a gnome wizard, a dwarven cleric, and an orc druid in active play right now. I'm making a halfling scout/ranger for a game soon, and as soon as I can find a game I'm interested in that doesn't have some sort of hate for the Tome of Battle I've got a few warblade/crusader concepts I want to test out, so I tend to be all over the place. I tend to avoid humans simply because that's what everyone expects, and I don't play elves because I friggin' hate elves. I like dwarves, I like halflings, and I like goliaths in games that allow LA buyoffs. I tend to play male characters simply because that's more comfortable for me, but there are one or two concepts I've had that strangely seem to work out to a female character. One thing I insist upon is that whatever I play is strong in whatever role it must fill. If the DM is using rolling, and I end with a really poor roll, if I'm not given a re-roll I will withdraw from the game, even if it's a really interesting concept. I've played the weak character before, and it's not fun for anyone around. ("Wizard, dispel the curse!" "I can't, I didn't roll well enough at statgen!" <Everyone dies.>)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
 [ 3 posts ] 

Board index » General » General Discussion

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

biz designed by GrafsS

© 2009 Victorious Press - Webmastered by Reina Sweet